Sat Aug 07, 2004, 08:23pm
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 400
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by mick
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by oatmealqueen
Quote:
Originally posted by zebraman
Varsity game two years ago (2-person). About 3 minutes left in the 4th quarter of a great, close game with playoff implications. Partner is lead, I'm trail. Team A is inbounding in frontcourt under their basket. A1 throws inbounds towards top of key where it glances off A2's hands and goes into backcourt. A3 gets control of it. I hear a whistle. My partner has called a backcourt violation! I blow my whistle and run up to him and explain to him that it can't be a backcourt violation without control. He agrees. He changes his call. I did not overrule him, but I sure as heck would have tried to overrule him in that situation if he had resisted. Get it right. Just another one of those times that makes me prefer a ref with good rules knowledge over one with amazing court presence (I prefer both, but given the choice......)
Z
|
Why would an official who doesn't understand this very simple, basic, no-brainer of a rule regarding a backcourt violation, be placed in such a big varsity game with playoff implications?
Just wondering.
|
C'mon...he earned it by marrying the assignor's sister.
|
No, he was assigned by the UPAC.
|
Easy now, mick!
__________________
omq -- "May I always be the kind of person my dog thinks I am."
|