Tue Aug 03, 2004, 12:13pm
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by WestMichBlue
"Is it possible to not have interfence it the offensive player touches the defensive player with her hand (Fed rules only)?"
YES! One of my favorate obscure case rulings. "F2, without the ball and with no chance to catch the ball, is blocking home plate. R1 pushes F2, but not flagrantly, out of the base path and touches home plate. RULING: Obstruction (which is dropped when R1 touches home plate safely."
HOWEVER, in the scenario provided I would have to say "Interference."
WMB
|
Relevance ?
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
|