Much simplier in Tennessee. Games are assigned on a local level (association) by an assigning officer and supervisor(s). To be eligible for post-season, they must attend a 'state-sponsored' camp ($175) once every 3 years. There is no rating system by the coaches. Tried that before, and it became a 'personality' contest. It became obvious that ability, judgement, and fairness wasn't a prerequisite for the coaches. It was all about, 'what will they do for me'. The officials that go to camp, in most cases, are given preference on assignments. Of course, there are exceptions. Most assigners and supervisors realize the importance of feedback from the coaches, AD's, or principles. Some of these people are 'fair and unbiased' in their opinions and some are not. The assigner and supervisor(s) must decipher the info from personal observation, watching videos, official's opinions, and that of coaches and administrators.
Also, the 'intangibles' must also be weighed. Such as, test scores, particpation in scrimmages/jamborees and local meetings, willingness to help other officials, character, and so forth.
|