Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by blindzebra
[B}
Where is your rule support?
|
Take a look at how the rules define guarding. That i smy rule support, as I have been claiming since about page 2 of this thread.
"Guarding is the act of legally placing the body in the PATH...."
Maybe to you PATH means the direction you think something SHOULD be going.
To me it means the direction something IS going.
[/B]
|
You still have not answered Chuck's A1 backing up, or my parallel path question and how they apply to closely guarded. WHY? Neither have B1 directly in the path of A1.
I still say under your interp, you can never have a 5 second
count. A1 just needs to turn away every 4 seconds. How does that fit the intent of the rule?
FYI, I spoke with Bill Kennedy tonight, so I asked him how he calls it. He said by LGP, within 6 feet, and actively guarding. He also said, that it is silly to expect B1 to defend a boundary and that the direction A1 is moving does not matter.