View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 17, 2004, 01:49pm
greymule greymule is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 3,100
it is not true that "the obstructed runner must be put out before anything is called." That is a misreading of the rule.

Of course you are correct. If the obstructed runner is not put out, the OBS call still determines where runners are placed.

I have a hard time with rules that reward a team for poorer play and punish them for better play. In #2, F5's team benefits because F5 couldn't hold onto the ball.

There's another scenario in which a member of the offense can benefit his team by committing a deliberate act of interference. My instinct tells me that the umpire should have discretion in such cases.

then you could also protect Baker

I think that is at the root of my questions. Can protection extend to a runner other than the one obstructed and, if so, under what circumstances?
__________________
greymule
More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men!
Roll Tide!
Reply With Quote