View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 01, 2001, 05:45pm
Rog Rog is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 289
Lightbulb numbers.....

This should really help increase the number of umps:

"There is discussion those of you seeing take home and open book exams may be in for a surprise. I have heard rumors that because of potential liability, Fed exams may turn to total closed book exams. Only rumored at this time, but seems to have some logic behind it."

NOT!




Quote:
Originally posted by Bfair
Fed Casebook plays 1.1.5 G & H both support Herb's position. These items used to be regularly tested items on Fed tests I took.

Fed tests would talk a lot of baseball, but they seemed to talk as much about the conduct and red tape issues. Keep in mind, they are responsible for putting out the umps in NFHS contests. They need to show their employeees are aware of these rules if only for the sake of covering potentially NFHS liability positions. There is discussion those of you seeing take home and open book exams may be in for a surprise. I have heard rumors that because of potential liability, Fed exams may turn to total closed book exams. Only rumored at this time, but seems to have some logic behind it.

Just my opinion,

Steve
Member
EWS
Reply With Quote