View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 27, 2001, 05:26am
Bfair Bfair is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 813
Who knows, at the protest committee they may have said Cooney acted within the intent of the General Instructions to Umpires which state it is more important to get the call right. Look in the book, the General Instructions are still there. If you have lost your rulebook, you might buy a new one---the General Instructions should still be there (at least the last time I looked). I consider that to be at least "authoritative opinion".

Don't forget, the protest in the Pine Tar incident went way of "intent" of rule vs. the actual verbatim wording and black & white print. I guess the commissioner's office must have seen some fine print between the lines that others couldn't see. It seems some may not have lost sight of the actual purpose of an umpire.......to be an impartial judge for fairness and balance......

Just my opinion,

Steve
Member
EWS
Reply With Quote