Thread: Screening vs Guarding
View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 27, 2004, 10:26pm
rainmaker rainmaker is offline
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
B1 is not required to be facing A1 when setting a screen against A1. That is why in my example, B4 is guilty of blocking for setting an illegal screen. B4 was not facing A1 when he attempted to set his screen against A1.
HUH!?!?!?!?

He's not required to be facing, but he's guilty for not facing?
Reply With Quote