Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
When a screen is set that does not meet the requirements of R4-S39-A2, the result is a blocking foul by the person attempting to set the screen.
|
Exactly!! It's not a screen if it doesn't meet the requirements of 4-39-2. It's blocking. Therefore, it's NOT a screen. 
|
Tony:
You are not bothering to read my entire post. I keep saying that when a player does not set a screen properly and illegal contact occurs, the foul is a blocking foul. When a defensive player does not obtain (NFHS)/establish (NCAA and FIBA) a legal guarding position properly and illegal contact occurs, the foul is a blocking foul.
In my example B4 attempted to screen A1. B4's attempt at setting a screen against A1 did not meeting the requirments of NFHS R4-S39, and when contact occured, B4 is guilty of a blocking foul. Please re-read my expample, you will see that R4-S39 applies and R4-S23 does not.
MTD, Sr.
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Go Youngstown (Ohio) State University Penguins!
Member:
Trumbull County (Warren, Ohio) Basketball Officials Association
Wood County (Bowling Green, Ohio) Basketball Officials Association
Ohio Association of Basketball Officials
International Association of Approved Basketball Officials
Wood County (Bowling Green, Ohio) Umpires Association
Ohio High School Athletic Association
Toledo, Ohio, United States of America
|