Quote:
Originally posted by Dakota
I don't agree with your views on an umpire's obligations in these situations.
Stopping play so the proper folks can care for an incapacitated player is completely different from being obligated (legally or morally) to remove an unskilled player because her lack of skill may pose a somewhat increased risk of injury than would a more skilled player.
Speaking ASA, unless we were talking about a real fireball pitcher with no control, I think it is unlikely I would ever use your "make him an offer he can't refuse" approach. However, if the need arose, I think it would be a useful tool.
|
I didn't say it was an obligation. I consider this a preemptive move. And, BTW, I'm not removing anyone. I'm just giving that coach the opportunity to complete the game. Remember, most ASA rules, including this area, are not age specific.
It is not uncommon to find a girl who can throw the ball a ton, but have no control especially at the younger ages. Control is something that can be taught, but that doesn't mean a pitcher retains that speed which got her noticed. As we all know, control is the key factor in a good pitcher.
As I stated, I don't care for the move, but the powers that be in ASA (Commissioners and Player Reps) enacted a rule which directs the umpire to make a non-medical decision with injured players. I don't see it a far reach from that to what I am suggesting.
BTW, how ironic that today I received a letter from Blue Cross of CA requesting information on the cause of my recent knee surgery. They make no secret that they want the information for the purposes of determing "if Blue Cross of California is entitled to be reimbursed by some other responsible party associated with or involved in an accident." I don't believe you need a law degree to figure out the umpire will be scrutinized should a patient note that the injury or accident occured during a ball game.
As I said before, JMHO,
[Edited by IRISHMAFIA on May 13th, 2004 at 07:03 PM]