Wed May 05, 2004, 09:18pm
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,022
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Rich Fronheiser
Quote:
Originally posted by DG
Quote:
Originally posted by Rich Fronheiser
Quote:
Originally posted by DG
Rich - I agree with the 5 feet over the head being uncatchable, and thus not interference, but FED wants this called interference this year, with Interp #20.
|
How does this jibe with interpretation #19?
I would NEVER call this, regardless of how "FED" wants it called.
|
In situation 19, BR was not in the running lane, but was in foul territory. Catcher in fair territory hit BR in the back. I call em like FED interprets, when doing FED games. You do what you want...
|
I always do.
|
It shows.
|