View Single Post
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 03, 2004, 12:35pm
CecilOne CecilOne is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally posted by Dakota
Quote:
Huh?
Runner leaves early from 1B on a caught fly.

Runner is past second when starts to return.

Defense attempts live ball appeal but overthrows 1B into DBT. Ball dead.

Runner now stranded (NFHS).
Runner may return to retouch (ASA).

NFHS: The defensive mistake (the overthrow into DBT) stranded the runner, giving the defense an out they could not earn with basic thrown & catch.

ASA: The defense blew their chance for an appeal by poor play. Runner returns and retouches.

Which seems more balanced to you?
My "Huh?" was about "it does take away possibilities from the offense", which seemed to mean or imply that the ASA rule restricts the offense more than the *FHS rule does.

But I also would like to know what I asked above about oversimplification.

WRT "simplifying things for umpires", rules that are not consistent with other codes never do that.

WRT "*FHS", I'm not sure we can call it "National" any more, if not all States follow it.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote