View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 03, 2004, 08:03am
Dakota Dakota is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally posted by WestMichBlue
Quote:
Which seems more balanced to you?"
NFHS.
We disagree.

I'm not "justifying" either set of rules; only making an observation that the ASA rule seems to me to strike a better balance (for the imperfect field conditions) than does the NFHS rule. I'm not anti-NFHS. Overall, they do a good job of recognizing their "constituents" (if you will) - school-age girls. Whereas ASA must take into account a much broader constituency, including little kids, boys, men, and women.

However, in this case, I believe ASA has the better rule, even for schoool-age girls.

Quote:
Originally posted by greymule
ASA's rule seems more fair to me.
I wouldn't say "fair" exactly, just keeps a better balance between the offensive mistake and the defensive mistake.

Quote:
Originally posted by greymule
To me, Fed's rule rewards the defense's error. Why does Fed insert an arbitrary point at which to strand runners?
Exactly.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote