View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 02, 2004, 01:29pm
DownTownTonyBrown DownTownTonyBrown is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,474
Smile Just read the article

May issue of Referee by Jay Miner
Covering Double Plays Using Modern Mechanics

Obviously the best situation is several officials, each with their respective duties/lines/bases/catches etc.

Jay hits similar points as discussed here for "traditional" three-man mechanics: stay ahead of the play, have it coming toward you. Then he contends some other points for "modern" mechanics: better, more accurate results with two umpires calling respective ends of a double play; statistically, more correct calls at 1st with ump starting behind 1st rather than behind 2nd baseman.

He recounts a bunt situation of R1 and R2 (U3 at D for the expected close play at third, U1 at B) that became a hit situation after fouling off two bunt attempts (U3 moved to C and U1 back to A). U3 was able to watch the front end of the double-play at 2nd and stay focused for interference, missed base, pulled foot etc. U1 was able to focus solely on play at 1st.

I can see potentially better coverage of the impending collision at 2nd and perhaps, if his statistics are plausible, a more accurate call at 1st.

Eeehhh, maybe some valid points. It's worth thinking about.
__________________
"There are no superstar calls. We don't root for certain teams. We don't cheat. But sometimes we just miss calls." - Joe Crawford
Reply With Quote