|
I always
. . . thought the same thing Tony until this season.
It is not FED but in an early season MLB game a lane violation was called (there is reference to it on this page somewhere) where the runner was obvious inside the line, HOWEVER THE THROW DID NOT HIT THE RUNNER it just went to his left and pst F3 and the interference was called . . .
Combine this with BFair's posts of last year where Rick Roder confirmed that a throw does not ONLY have to come from the little square behind the runner we are starting to see different views of what was once a pretty simple rule.
I am now confused, officially.
Tee
|