Quote:
Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
... As I have stated before, I really believe that this is a have to see the actual play to really make an informed ruling.
|
Your original post simply stating the foul is on B1 notwithstanding I take it.
|
Based upon the original post, I would charge B1 with the foul, but based upon the amount and content of discussion that this post has generated leads me to believe that this type of play is a have to see it to make the call.
|
So A1 rocks back on her non-pivot foot enticing B1 to occupy the space she has abandoned. She does so without contact. A1 has a change of heart and pushes B1 to the floor as she attempts to retake that space that B1 now occupies.
Foul on B1 because she has violated an undefined "cylinder of verticality"?
Nah, I don't think so. Having assumed a NONvertical position A1 cannot expect to be protected by a concept that requires that she is vertical.