Tue Apr 27, 2004, 10:27pm
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Just north of hell
Posts: 9,250
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Quote:
Originally posted by Hawks Coach
Mark
The lead in makes no reference to defense, that is clearly true. But it is only a lead-in to a set of conditions that must be met. The very first condition that must be met to even have a right to this principle of verticality is that you must have legal guarding position. that is the construct of the rule you cite.
So until you can show me where an offensive player can obtain legal guarding position, I am not inclined to believe that verticality applies to the offense. Verticality by it's nature belongs to the defense, when contact occurs and the defense has maintained verticality, the responsibility is on the offense. When the defense either has not achieved legal guarding position (therefore having no right to verticality) or leaves the vertical plane, then the responsibilty of the defense.
That is, and always has been, the way this rule is written and intended to be enforced.
|
According to your application of verticality:
A1 has legally reached a position on the court. A2 throws a pass to A1. A1 must jump straight up with his/her arms extended straight up to catch the ball. Since the principal of verticality does not apply to an offensive player, while A1 is in the air from his/her jump, B1 can push A1 out of the way so that he/she may intercept A2's pass.
I hope you really do not want B1 to be allowed to play this type of defense.
|
Since when does verticality apply to a simple run of the mill push? Are you telling us B1 can legally push A1 if A1 happens to not be vertical?
|