View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 09, 2004, 01:55pm
Kevzebra Kevzebra is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 109
Quote:
Originally posted by IRISHMAFIA
Quote:
Originally posted by Kevzebra
Here is a play for all to learn from:

Team A is at bat with one out and a runner on third. Batter A2 bunts the ball up the first base line. Runner A1 breaks on the bunt. 1st base B1 tags A2 and then is run into by A2. B1 is knocked to the ground and has no opportunity to throw out the runner.

Having been an umpire for 10 years and now a coach,
Step backwards?

Quote:
I wanted to get information on what others think about the situation. I have it on tape and know that interference should have been called, runner on third out on the interference.
Not necessarily. A runner has every right to try and advance to 1B and are not required to check-up just because the fielder is trying to tag them.

For me, the BR would have to intentionally interfere with F3. If the fielder is dumb enough to step in front of the runner, it is not the runner's responsibility to avoid the fielder.
I just hope I never see you on the field. the runner has to avoid contact with the fielder if possible. Just because they are going to be tagged out dosen't give them the right to bowl over the defense. It was so clear she wanted to prevent the runner being tagged out at home. Probably why I got dumped for arguing the call into the next inning (well, telling the ump he missed the call).

[Edited by Kevzebra on Apr 9th, 2004 at 02:58 PM]
Reply With Quote