Quote:
Originally posted by just another ref
All quite right. Which brings this to mind. There seems to be as much or more focus on the .2 which was put back on the clock as on the foul call. If the call had been (NFHS)
foul before the buzzer, free throws with the lane clear, would that have been somehow easier to accept than the fact that "All this happened at .2!!"
|
And had the best NFHS refs in the country been doing that game, that's exactly what would have happened.
By NCAA rules, though, they did everything right. If coaches, players, fans, etc. don't like the replay rules, they should lobby to get TV monitor reviews taken out of the game altogether.