View Single Post
  #33 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 22, 2004, 01:45pm
Dakota Dakota is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally posted by chuck chopper
Here I am again on this. The ASA will not allow a protest on a play that failed to "conclude" because of the Umpire.
And, you know this how? The only thing I see in Rule 9 is ASA will not allow a protest on anything that purely involves the accuracy of the umpire's judgment.
Quote:
Originally posted by chuck chopper
Even if the ASA changed the application of a protest to allow one in this situation, the game would go back to a full count on the batter.
The BR would never be awarded first, so I cannot find clause for allowing that.
This presupposes you are finding a "clause" to disallow the protest on the grounds the umpire screwed up very badly, instead of just badly. Again, where are you finding these clauses? Is there more written on allowed / disallowed protests than Rule 9? POE 41? Case Book section 9?
Quote:
Originally posted by chuck chopper
Thus I go back to my 1st response and say I wish we "would" allow a protest, and fix it right then and there.
Since you've morphed this over to ASA, using 10-6C (very similar to the NFHS 10-2-3m), how would you fix this? That is the real question, isn't it?
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote