View Single Post
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 17, 2004, 01:54am
Jurassic Referee Jurassic Referee is offline
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Re: good thought

Quote:
Originally posted by Nevadaref

[/B]
It wasn't the argument that I originally picked, but you may have something here as one of the Referee's duties is to verify the score at the end of each HALF. So if they shoot the FTs then go to the table and pick up their jackets, switch the AP arrow, and verify the score, I think that you have to consider the points if any from the FTs to be part of the 2nd quarter! It will be interesting to see what JR says about that. I'm sure he'll shoot it down somehow.
[/B][/QUOTE]
If the officials verify the score at the END of a half, you're trying to tell me that they are really verifying the score IN the second quarter? Great argument, guys. Not too logical, though. Somehow I don't think that I'm gonna buy that particular scenario.

Same point, guys, for the umpteenth time. The second quarter ENDED!!!! The second quarter ENDED, by rule!!!! AFTER the second quarter ENDED, the T was handed out. AFTER the second quarter ENDED, the FT's for the T were taken- in BOTH cases. The throw-in part of the penalty for the T was administered by rule also- specifically Rule 5-6-4 AND case book play 6.3.1SitB. There is NO rule that will allow you to use an AP to start the 3rd quarter in this situation.

Is that the casebook play that you were looking for, Nevada?


[Edited by Jurassic Referee on Mar 17th, 2004 at 01:07 AM]
Reply With Quote