|
A couple of things for clarification:
-the defender was not even close to being under the basket, so that was not an option.
-the hack did not in any way shape or form cause the charge so that was off the table.
Here is what the officials in the sitch did (again NCAA-W):
Waved off the basket, called the hack on B1 and gave A1 two free throws with players on the lane. I do not believe they assessed A1 a foul for player control even though they evidently used this as reasoning to wipe the basket. (I am only 80% sure on the foul not being assessed to A1 because I was watching on TV and it might have been missed)
I think I am falling on the side of the false double foul, but I still don't follow the reasoning of clearing the lane. I think I would have a foul on B1 for hack, a PC foul on A1, no basket and two free throws with players on the lane.
__________________
Church Basketball "The brawl that begins with a prayer"
|