Sat Feb 28, 2004, 01:37pm
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,517
|
|
Quote:
It is my opinion that A2, as long as met the requirements of R4-S39-A5, then his position on the floor is legal. While Camron's Casebook Play refers to a player who has fallen to the floor, while A2 in this thread's play intentionally went to the floor on all fours, I still believe his position on the floor is legal.
If A2 does not violate R4-S39-A5 and does not bend his body, then the part of R10-S6-A1 that I would apply to this play is that a player should not use rough tactics, and in my opinion this is a rough tactic. I would go as far as to say that A2's conduct could be considered a flagrant foul.
MTD, Sr. [/B]
|
So which is it MTD? Are you saying its legal but flagrant?
__________________
foulbuster
|