Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
Originally posted by Snaqwells
Here's the ruling.
Flagrant Personal on V32.
Flagrant Technicals on H22 & H42.
Well after the table has been notified of the ejections, V32 commits a Flagrant Technical on his way by white bench. (never should have been there, but too late now)
|
V32 and H22 were the original two participants, weren't they? Call that a fight with a double flagrant personal foul, disqualify both of them, but no FT's are handed out(see first sentence of RULING in case book play 10.4.4SitA). Then give H42 a flagrant technical foul for fighting, and also give V32 another flagrant technical foul for his act on the way out. The last two fouls occured at different times, so you have a false double foul situation composed of 2 flagrant T's. Penalize these fouls in the order that they occurred. The visiting team will shoot 2 FT's for H42's T, and then the home team will shoot 2 FT's for V32's second T. The home team then gets the ball at center for V32's second T. The AP does not come into play at all. If the visiting head coach had been notified of V32's ejection for his first T, then he would also be charged with an indirect T for V32's second T.
|
We ended up ruling that H22's reaction was late enough to call it a dead ball foul. However, looking back, I could see going your route would have made it simpler. Thanks.
Thanks, also, for answering the question about whether the last flagrant T should offset one of the earlier T's on either H22 or H42.
Thanks, too, to Juulie.