Quote:
Originally posted by ronny mulkey
Clark Kent,
You have the sitch right - just the players reversed. I think people are thinking that I am asking if the screen is legal or if the foul should be on the person setting the screen. I'm not. Would you rule the contact (by the person being screened) as incidental because the screen was set "outside his visual vision"?
|
Whether the screen was "outside the field of vision" has nothing to do with judging incidental contact by the person being screened -- it has everything to do with judging incidental contact by the person setting the screen.