Quote:
Originally posted by footlocker
Understand, Player A did not go looking for contact here. Player B intentionally stood in the path of A but chose not to face him.
|
Now that's a horse of a different color. If B1's back was to A1 as he went up for the layup how could B1 have
intentionally stood in A1's path as he went up for the layup? Sounds like maybe B1 stepped in front of A1 with his back turned to him or turned his back on him after he was set? In that case if A1 was airborne before B1 took his position we have a clear block. But if B1 was stationary through all this then A1 is responsible for illegal contact.