
Wed Jan 28, 2004, 10:33pm
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
|
|
Re: Question
Quote:
Originally posted by Mr. BenchPress
Just a question, and I realize hind sight is 20-20, but wouldn't the Super Bowl official most likely had to have been Ed Hochuli? Here's why: I figure, like many have said, that the NFL wants to use crews that have already worked a playoff game in the first two rounds. But like the regular season, they probably don't want to have referees officiating games involving the same team in a short time period. In otherwords, Carolina advancing to the Super Bowl elminated 3 referees (Coleman, Carey, and, course, Kukar). New England advancing eliminated 1 more referee (Carollo) [Coleman did second game]. That left four officials who worked playoff games that didn't involve a team in the Super Bowl; Jeff Triplette (TEN-BAL), Johnny Grier (DEN-IND), Gerry Austin (KC-IND), and Hochuli (PHI-GB). Now I would contend, as some have on this board, that Grier had a bad year and I was surprised he got a playoff game. Triplette is a relatively inexperienced referee; Austin, while very good, has worked two Super Bowls in the last five or so years. Now while none of this really matters, and I am sure there is no reason a referee who hasn't worked since the regular season couldn't work the Super Bowl, if I were a betting man, Ed Hochuli would have been my choice as soon as Carolina beat Philadelphia.
|
None of that has anything to do with it, Mr. BP. Before the season even kicked off, it was already determined that the #1 rated crew would work the Super Bowl. Hoculi's crew was rated #1, in spite of having 4 crew members who have less than 5 years of experience in the league. I don't think that's a mistake as there's something to be said for leadership.
It unfortunate that those 4 guys won't get to work the SB. But I wouldn't worry. I'm sure they'll get a chance in another year or two.
|