Quote:
Originally posted by Dubby
First off, in 10-2-2 (case and rule book) it only says that a T is charged, it doesn't say who gets it.
|
The Technical Foul Summary table says it's a technical foul on the substitute. It does not say it's an indirect on the coach.
10-2-2 states a "A substitute shall not enter the court:" The Penalty states that it's a technical foul to do this. If it was an idirect on the head coach, it would say that it is, just like it does in EVERY other situation where an indirect is assessed. It doesn't have to say "This does not result in an indirect technical foul on the coach."
Again, we ask you, if what you say is true, then why is there a need for 10-2-2? 10-4-2 would cover it.
But it doesn't. 10-2-2 applies specifically to this situation. That's why there's a case play. That's why all the other situations that incude an indirect T on the head coach have it listed in the penalty section and in the Technical Foul Summary table.
