|
Read the situation. B trails A. A does not see B and trip. A is on a fast break ahead of B. If there is contact between B and A with B trailing A, B is responsible by rule. This is not as complicated as you now seek to make it.
And from the subject title of this post, the trip by B of A is strongly implied.
Would you have a no call with B trailing A, B contacts A's foot from behind and A subsequently falls?
|