View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 13, 2004, 03:02pm
SteveF SteveF is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 63
Quote:
Originally posted by ChuckElias
Quote:
Originally posted by SteveF
Yeah it does fit into that criteria. 2) interfering with the ball following a goal.
I think you're stretching quite a bit, Steve. There has been no goal in the situation under discussion; merely a missed attempt. Additionally, case 10-1-5D makes it clear that the infraction is contacting the ball after a made goal, preventing the other team from making a quick throw-in.
Forgot that the shot was missed in the original post. Just playing devil's advocate.
Reply With Quote