View Single Post
  #36 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 12, 2004, 04:26pm
BktBallRef BktBallRef is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Re: This is how I am looking at it.

Quote:
Originally posted by JRutledge
So what difference does it make if one calls a timeout and then the other team calls a timeout?
Because we cannot grant B's TO request until A1 is either replaced or Team A uses a TO to keep him in the game.

One of these two things must happen before B can be granted a TO.

Quote:
Originally posted by cmathews
I am still not convinced that A can't call the TO after B's TO. The portion of the case 3.3.1d doesn't mention that A must call it first, only that A1 may remain in the game if Team A requests and is granted a time-out. I would think that they would clarify that it must occur before B's TO due to the fact that B can't be granted a TO before the substitution, if that is indeed what they mean.
Yes, that's what they mean. A1's status must be clarified before B's request can be granted.
Reply With Quote