View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 10:04am
SamIAm SamIAm is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Irving, Texas
Posts: 675
By your wording, bc Violation. You said A1 made to his fc. If A1 did not have both feet and the ball in the fc then he had bc status. If he had fc status, then bc Violation.

Your post accounts for the ball, "the ball did not come close to crossing over to bc". And it accounts for one foot, "causing A1's foot to cross to the bc".
Where was his other foot? If it was in the fc, bc violation, if it was in the bc, then no bc violation.
__________________
- SamIAm (Senior Registered User) - (Concerning all judgement calls - they depend on age, ability, and severity)
Reply With Quote