Thread: INTENTIONAL OR
View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 24, 2001, 03:03am
pizanno pizanno is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 336
Question I agree w/paul

Technical would have been more correct (technically)...but i see why you called I.F. Everyone knew right away what you had and why.

However, this borders on the punch or swing that misses, which neccesitates a flagrant/eject. What's the difference between an arm and a leg (or a head-butt, for that matter!) It's the intent we're penalizing, right?

If player HAD tripped him, would you have called a flagrant?
Reply With Quote