Quote:
Originally posted by garote
Weird chain of events Just want to know if we got it right??....In an AAU Christmas Tourney had a player from white foul the red team player on a shot. My partner is the "L" and calls the foul. Then the red player that just fouled the shooter kicks the shin of another player right in front of my partner who calls the intentional foul. As he is reporting the foul, reds head coach unloads the "F" bomb. So now a Tech to the coach.
So we had 2 for the shot, 2 for the intentional, 2 for the tech. Now the question. We placed the ball on the base line for the white team because of the Intentional foul. Right or wrong????
|
Chuck, I think we should get this clear before figuring out what to do according to the NCAA.
White fouls red - 2 shots
Red kicks white (it says red just fouled then kicks another player. I thought white fouled red?) - intentional T 2 shots and ball at division line
Red coach - 2 shots point of interruption
The intentional T gives the ball to white so the POI is at the division line for the T on the coach. So, I would administer the shots T, intentional T, foul shots. Should the foul shots come before the intentional T? I think the intentional T is the only thing that could effect the order you shoot the shots.
This is a constructive scenario.