Tue Dec 23, 2003, 08:35pm
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
|
|
|
Re: I don't think that's what we concluded, rainmaker.
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by Kevin Dunn
Does the disconcertion rule apply to bench personnel from the opposing team?
|
We've talked about this in the past, and I think we concluded that by the book, it doesn't, but in reality it might, but to weigh the situation carefully.
|
The FED issued a ruling about 3/4 years ago that said that you definitely could call disconcertion on the bench.
|
Agreed. Rule states "No opponent shall disconcert the free thrower." An opponent is any participant of the opposing team.
|
Okay, I'd rather have it this way anyway. Why do I not remember something which turned out the way I want it!?!?
|