Quote:
|
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
|
The dribble started with the first bat- Rule 4-15-1. Then the language in casebook play 4.15.4SitD(a) spells out the violation- "Violation in (a) because the ball was touched twice by A1's hand(s) during a dribble before it touched the floor". You use the same rationale as this casebook play for Nevada's example. [/QUOTE]
I am having a hard time envisioning how NevRef's situation occurred. Where the player's feet schuffling? I re-read his post and see he states that the player "pushed" the ball... If the feet are not moving before the dribble started, I cannot see a violation....