I agree with the logic of the interpretation being skewed..Like coach said if it doesn't delay the game the player should be allowed back in, but I do think that Juulie hit it right on the head, A has to buy A1's return with a TO...If I remember right when the rule was added or changed they mentioned that fact that it is unfair to team A to have their stud on the bench because of blood if they have a TO and can rectify the situation..with this interp I think savy coaches from the opposing team with call a TO with the intention of keeping A1 from coming back, which will lead to more interps and maybe a whole new section of rules and exceptions LOL
