Wed Nov 19, 2003, 06:47pm
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
|
|
|
Re: Re: We need BBRef Tony
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by DownTownTonyBrown
I'm not sure of the applicability of those four requirements. As I understand them they are for a player with BC status that touches the ball....
In this case: Player A1 jumps from FC, touches ball (both A1 and ball still have FC status), ball bounces in BC (ball now has BC status), and then is caught by A2 in FC. Violation?
What if the ball bounces in the BC and then once more in the FC (now has FC status) before being reteived by A2? Violation?
The applicable rule 9-9-1 reads:
Be the first to touch a ball after it has been in team control in the FC, if he/she or a teammate last touched or was touched by the ball in the FC before it went to the BC.
I'm gonna say no violation in either the single or double bounce scenarios.
There is no violation when A1 touches the ball. Is there a violation when the ball touches the BC? I don't see a rule that says "Yes." Is there a violation when A2 touches the ball? I say no because when A2 touches the ball it now has FC status again. But I'm still not certain because of that 'when A2 touches the ball' question.
How about this ....
Is it a violation if A1 stands in his FC and bounces the ball with spin such that it bounces in the BC and then returns to him in the FC?
If this is a violation then likely the original scenario is also a violation... the double bounce probably not because the ball regains FC status before being touched.
I underlined the word before in the above rule quote because it seems to be the operative or determining factor. If it is, then perhaps none of these are BC violations.
Tony, give us a solid answer.
[Edited by DownTownTonyBrown on Nov 19th, 2003 at 05:33 PM]
|
Just to show off a little, I'm gonna predict that BktBallRef Tony will say BC violation. So would Padgett. He's the real BC maven.
|
|