Quote:
Originally posted by IRISHMAFIA
Of course, all those anti-trickery folks will totally disagree with this, but there are two teams out there and if one is a bit smarter than the other, who am I to stop them 
|
Those folks lost out on the proposal to end the "unfair" rule allowing the batter to run on a supposed D3K. Personally, I like legal trickery. It allows creative and knowledgable teams to prevail. That is how it should be.
However, if both teams act as if an inning has ended, even though none of the requirements were met for the third out, does that mean it has, in fact, ended?
My question is not about whether the trickery should be allowed, but whether the trickery was successful if the runner did not enter DBT?