View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 13, 2003, 06:50pm
chris s chris s is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 508
Re: The X man rule

Quote:
Originally posted by Simbio
I know we're not talking about little league, but this is a rule that I can't stand (in part because I was an X when I was growing up.)

If I kid weighs more than a certain weight in his respective age group, they put a big X on his helmet. This is to let everyone know that he can't carry the ball, punt the ball (he can free-kick however), he has to be a lineman. If he's an offensive lineman, he has to be covered on the end. If he's a defensive lineman, his inside shoulder cannot be any further than the outside shoulder of the tackle.

I'm sure there are similar rules elsewhere, but I find it ridiculous that we should penalize a kid for weighing too much (which in most cases means he's just fat.) I had a couple of friends that were X's in little league, then when they got to high school level, one became a fantastic quarterback and one was an all-state linebacker (two positions they couldn't play in little league.

I know that they're main concern is not to have a monster carrying the ball, or being a major rusher. But if they're going to put limits on that, then why don't they do the same for a kid that exceptionally fast? Doesn't that give an advantage too?

Maybe it's just the fat kid in me venting, but I think they should change it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~
Gee, around here if you are not in high school and weigh over 115 for pee-wee or 155 for midget, you don't even get on a team. When I played youth ball, lower weight limit was 70, I started the season at 72 and got up to 80....started at center and nose....quick and I was afraid of nothing! Boy, did I get a lot smarter in high school
Reply With Quote