View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 13, 2003, 05:50pm
DownTownTonyBrown DownTownTonyBrown is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,474
Re: Why not a third opinion

Quote:
Originally posted by Hawks Coach
I can't see going with the common foul when one ref has given the intentionhal foul signal. That is inviting even more trouble.

I think that going wih the intentional as the overriding foul is the best way to deal with this situation unless you really think you need the multple foul scenario. You will give shots and ball, not a bad outcome for the fouled team, and you avoid the bizarre, not a bad outcome for the officiating team.
I like that... basically ignore the first because of its minor nature and penalize the second, more serious foul.

Nice, nice. Much easier to sell than ignoring the serious foul. Thanx!
__________________
"There are no superstar calls. We don't root for certain teams. We don't cheat. But sometimes we just miss calls." - Joe Crawford
Reply With Quote