View Single Post
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 12, 2003, 02:07pm
rockyroad rockyroad is offline
Esteemed Participant
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 4,775
Somebody help me out here - without starting a new argument or more e-mails to anyone at the National Federation...didn't the Fed issue a clarification that said a defender standing with a foot oob is not in legal guarding position - and if there is a crash it will be a block???? Someone please remind me of the website that had that link, please...the reason: had our HS State Rules Clinic the other day, and the lady running it said that both feet had to be inbounds to establish initial legal guarding position, but after that the foot could be oob and still have a player control foul called...I went "HMMMMMM, that doesn't sound right", but can't find the clarification site...help, please.
Reply With Quote