View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 28, 2003, 01:20pm
Indy_Ref Indy_Ref is offline
Official Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Greater Indianapolis Area
Posts: 436
Send a message via Yahoo to Indy_Ref
Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
I sent Mary Struckhoff an email on Sunday night detailing why the Ruling in Situation 7(a) was incorrect. As of last night I had not received a response from her nor had the clarification been posted on the NFHS website.

This morning I received a response from Mary with her telling to read the clarification on the NFHS website.

At this moment, I still am of the opinion that the clarification cannot be supported by rule, but have not started an official reply to Mary. Right now I can only say that I am appalled by the logic used in the clarification and that the NFHS intends to change the rules in 2004-05 to support its clarification.
"Be 100% correct in your primary area!"
Reply With Quote