Quote:
Originally posted by RookieDude
Very true...I didn't communicate well...
What I should have said was if it is a T, since it is a dead ball, it would be an intentional technical...not just a T. When I stated not necessarily a T that was wrong, since it was a dead ball (after the whistle). I should have said not necessarily a Flagrant Foul, which would be an Intentional Flagrant Foul during a dead ball.
RD
|
Two points....
There is no reason to call an "intentional technical". The penalty is the exact same as a technical. Contact while the ball is dead that is rule intentional can simply be called a technical (unless flagrant).
There is no such thing as an "Intentional Flagrant Foul". It's either intentional or it is flagrant. Not both.
Also, the term intentional is really a bad term since it may or may not involve actual intent. In this case, I actually like the NBA's method of having flagrant 1 and flagrant 2.