View Single Post
  #61 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 23, 2003, 06:53pm
oc oc is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 322
Re: Re: Hmmmmmmmmm

Quote:
Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Quote:
Originally posted by BigDave

Clarify this for me please.



NFHS R4-S23-A3a: After the initial legal guarding position is obtained the guard is not required to have either or both feet on the PLAYING COURT or continue facing the opponent.

NFHS R4-S23-A3b: After the initial legal guarding position is obtained the guard my move laterally or obliquely to maintain postion, provided it is not toward the opponent when contact occurs.

I don't like the interpretation either but agree with JR that that is the way it should be called if the interpretaion says so. MTD-Here is my attempt to rationalize the interp with the book. S23-A3a says "not required to have either or both feet on the the playing court". It would be jump in logic to now say that you can put your feet down OUTSIDE the playing court. The rule does not say that. All it says is that you are not required to have the feet ON the playing court. i.e. you feet can be in the air.

The rule book is unclear on whether a player can put the feet down outside the playing court.-It does not say if you can or can't. Like it or not but the interpretation clears that up.
Reply With Quote