View Single Post
  #44 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 22, 2003, 09:58am
Indy_Ref Indy_Ref is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Greater Indianapolis Area
Posts: 436
Send a message via Yahoo to Indy_Ref
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
Originally posted by Indy_Ref
Again, I say:

Quote:
If the defense wasn't allowed to move slightly out-of-bounds to keep his legal guarding position, then SECTION 23, ART. 3b should read:

The guard may move laterally or obliquely ON THE PLAYING COURT to maintain position, provided it is not toward the opponent when contact occurs.

Therefore, if this happens in my game, I have either player control or charge.

So,you would call a pc foul if the defender had a foot on the line, even though the RULE explicitly states that you can't. That's exactly what I thought that you have been saying.

Good luck!
JR,

You and I must not be reading the same book. I've communicated my position as clearly as I think I can. And, I believe I've clearly pointed out the fallacy in the new rules clarification. You can ref by the interpretation, Mark and I will ref by the rule book.
__________________
"Be 100% correct in your primary area!"
Reply With Quote