View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 19, 2003, 05:47pm
IRISHMAFIA IRISHMAFIA is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by WestMichBlue
"The only correct ruling I can imagine would be if they ruled R1 had not yet reached 2B"

But, the situation presented by Dukat had R1 starting on 2B. Maybe she was going back, thinking the ball had been caught, but at a minimum she was already at 2B so there could not be two runners between the same bases at the time of the throw.

BTW - both the NFHS casebook and ASA POE37 are going to give you the same interpretation that only the lead runner can be advanced two bases (when two runners are between the same bases).

IMO, the umpires were wrong - at least as far as is known based on what Dukat told us. The only time that ONE base is awarded is when a fielder loses possession of the ball to DBT. That could happen if F3 caught the ball from F1 and swung her glove at the BR - and lost the ball into DBT. It would be a real stretch to suggest that F1 "lost possession" of the ball when she threw it into the dugout.

WMB
Would you believe that I realized that and was testing the rest of the board?

No!?!? Well, you're right, I just didn't read the scenario properly. And I agree, that there is no other way to justify the award UNLESS, R1 jumped off the base toward 1B when she saw the line drive heading up the middle and the umpire ruled that 2B would be the 1st base of a two-base award. Still wrong, but I can see someone making that call.

d:-)
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote