View Single Post
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 10, 2026, 09:17am
JRutledge JRutledge is offline
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,695
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac View Post
First year we spent much of the (needed) time on the new and improved faking being fouled rule, especially the timing the warnings and penalties.

Some marked spot issues with backcourt and various timeouts.

Some held ball marked spot isssues, a held ball is technically not a violation nor a foul, but is a stoppage in play.

Wise move by the NFHS to go from four marked spots to eight marked spots.

Now we're dealing with throwin violations.

Hopefully the NFHS (and IAABO) will get this all cleared up this coming season.
Again sounds like a personal issue of understanding or a lack of understanding. I was not struggling with FBF because, as a college official, we were doing this for some time. I just love that we had people so loud about "It was already a technical foul," but never called that ever in their careers but would tell you how much the rule was already in place. Now they came up with a remedy and now that is too much to handle (officials in general) and people come up with all kinds of reasons not to call a FBF warning. So instead of the behavior stopping, we keep it going because everyone in the game does it.

I do not see anything the NF or the IAABO needs to clear up, the rule is already in place. They changed some wording to take away some debates over when that original spot is to be considered, but it seems like people were just trying to overthink this anyway, and why we are where we are.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote