|
Deemed And Eligible ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by bucky
... the simultaneous "control" would physically occur before a coach/player could call timeout so why would there ever be a concern about granting a TO? The held ball occurs first.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac
... and while we're waiting to see if it can be wrestled away cleanly (i.e., no held ball yet) can either player, both of whom have two hands (for sake of clarity) holding (player control) the ball, request and be granted a timeout? Note that the definition of player control does not currently say "exclusive" player control regarding requesting and being granted a timeout. It just says player control which can simply mean holding the ball.
|
If said player is deemed to be holding the ball (in this case with two hands), he is also deemed to have player control, and thus is he also eligible to request and be granted a timeout?
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)
Last edited by BillyMac; Mon Feb 16, 2026 at 02:09pm.
|