Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
"No" is the correct answer, imo. I didn't even know the rule book had this wording issue until it was brought up here. I was always taught, and other codes agree, that it's only on a throw-in violation (not on any violation) that A loses the arrow.
|
An addition of word "throwin" previous to the word "violation" in case play 6.4.5 SITUATION A would have been very helpful.
But it's not there right now, thus the current caseplay suggests a yes answer.
I'm not proud of myself, I should have answered yes, got one wrong, and used the caseplay to fight for my yes answer, which could have possibly led IAABO and the NFHS to a change the wording in future casebooks.